심리학의 원리/심리학의 원리2
심리학의 원리/심리학의 원리2
Blog Article
What in all probability remains real, nonetheless, is that almost all men Use a significantly less auditory and a more articulatory verbal creativeness than they are apt to be familiar with. The experiment proves how dependent our verbal creativeness is on true inner thoughts in lips, tongue, throat, larynx, etcetera. The normally-obtained notion is that it's just a milder degree of precisely the same process which occurred if the thing now imagined was sensibly perceived. Believe me, who For most a thousand calendar year The same hard meat have chewed and examined, That with the cradle to your bier No man the ancient leaven has digested! In favor in the sensationalistic or nativistic look at of 1 these kinds of scenario, begin to see the essential paper by Von Kries, Archiv f. Once we occur to check hallucinations in the chapter on Outer Notion, we shall see that this is on no account a detail of scarce occurrence. A person blind of his visual Mind-centres can no a lot more see darkness out of the parts of his retina that happen to be linked With all the brain-lesion than he can see it out in the skin of his again.
The most vivid touch-images come when we ourselves barely escape local injury, or when we see another injured. It would seem that in such a case the neural process corresponding to the imagination must be the entire tract concerned in the actual sensation, even down as far as the retina. Life somewhat better might content him, But for the gleam of heavenly light which Thou hast lent him: He calls it Reason--thence his power's increased, To be far beastlier than any beast. So far as I know there is only one other published report of a similar experience. Enter not so stall-fed quite, Like elephant-calves about one! A few monographs by competent observers, like Stricker, about their own peculiarities, would give much more valuable information about the diversities which prevail. Moreover there are no facts which oblige us to think that, within the occipital cortex, one part is connected with sensation and another with mere ideation or imagination. To most people the image is at first 'thick,' as the sound of the word would be if they tried to pronounce it with the lips parted. So of a baby crying in a distant part of the house, we are uncertain whether we still hear it, or only imagine the sound.
A good way of bringing The problem to consciousness is always that proposed by Stricker: Partly open up your mouth and afterwards think about any term with labials or dentals in it, including 'bubble, 'toddle.' Is your graphic underneath these problems unique? The actions of articulate speech Perform a predominant aspect in his mental existence. I am going to play the comedy with art. The enigmatic stories of the result of magnets and metals, even should they be due, as several contend, to unintentional recommendation over the operator's component, surely contain hyperæsthetic notion, for the operator seeks too as is possible to hide The instant in the event the magnet is introduced into play, and however the subject not merely finds it out that minute in a means obscure, but may well establish consequences which (in the first occasion definitely) the operator did not expect to find. The boy taking part in 'I spy,' the criminal skulking from his pursuers, the superstitious individual hurrying with the woods or past the churchyard at midnight, The person shed during the woods, the Female who tremulously has built an night appointment together with her swain, all are topic to illusions of sight and sound which make their hearts conquer until They can be dispelled.
THE NEURAL PROCESS WHICH UNDERLIES IMAGINATION? This is inexplicable if the imagination be simply a weaker excitement of the sensational process. The truth seems to be that the cases where peripheral sense-organs are directly excited in consequence of imagination are exceptional rarities, if they exist at all. In persons whose auditory imagination is weak, the articulatory image seems to constitute the whole material for verbal thought. What you have no idea of you cannot miss; and their not definitely missing this great region out of their sight seems due to the fact that their very idea and memory of it is lost along with the sensation. A statistical inquiry on a large scale, into the variations of acoustic, tactile, and motor imagination, would probably bear less fruit than Galton's inquiry into visual images. Now we know that currents usually flow one way in the nervous system; and for the peripheral sense-organs to be excited in these cases, the current would have to flow backward. Were there centres for crude optical sensation below the cortex, the patients in these cases would still feel light and darkness.